The Cultural and Creative Industries (CCIs) are one of Europe's largest economic
ecosystems: in 2023 some 2.1 million cultural enterprises generated around
€524 billion in net turnover within the EU business economy, and the
sector employs 7.9 million people — a workforce larger than telecommunications and
the automotive industry combined, over 99.9% of which are SMEs. They produce the
content that gives Europe's digital economy its meaning, its democratic culture, and its
global voice.
More than a cultural sector — innovation infrastructure.
CCIs are not only a sector that produces and protects culture — they are a
cross-cutting knowledge-valorisation infrastructure that turns
research and human insight into products, services and systems across every ECF
Policy Window. Artistic research and design are the clearest cases: design
methodology is knowledge translation by definition, and the most legible model of
what CCIs bring to the FP10 knowledge triangle. This reach is structural — CCIs
already work across tourism, sport, healthcare, mobility, digital infrastructure,
public services and manufacturing, the very bridge linking a CCI priority to the
proposed Policy Windows. Design capability is a measurable predictor of innovation
and start-up success: CCIs are the architects of new value propositions, not only
cultural workers.
What is the ECF?
The European Competitiveness Fund (ECF) is the EU's
proposed flagship industrial and innovation instrument under the next
Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF), running from 2028 to
2034. It is designed as a single, simplified
investment vehicle that consolidates and replaces the patchwork of
existing programmes — Horizon Europe (research), Digital Europe,
InvestEU, EU4Health, the European Defence Fund, parts of CEF and LIFE
and more — into one coherent framework. Funding is organised into a
small number of Policy Windows covering Strategic
Technologies, Clean Transition, Industry & Single Market, Defence
& Space, Health, and the Digital sphere. Inside each window sit
the dedicated budget lines, governance bodies and procurement tracks
that decide where the money actually flows.
If a sector is not named in a Policy Window, it does not
exist for the ECF. No dedicated calls, no representation in
the Strategic Stakeholders Board, no weight in the Investment
Committee, no consideration in pre-commercial procurement — and, in
practice, no path to the multi-billion-euro lines that will define
European industrial policy for the next decade.
Why now — the window is closing.
The Commission's ECF proposal is on the table. Parliament and Council
are forming their positions, and trilogue negotiations will determine
the final structure within months. Once the Regulation is adopted,
its architecture — the Policy Windows, the strategic sector list, the
governance bodies — is locked in for the full seven-year
cycle. Amending it later requires reopening the Multi-Annual
Financial Framework itself, which historically does not happen.
At the same moment, the EU AI Office, the
General-Purpose AI Code of Practice, and the
implementation bodies of the AI Act are taking shape — and shaping
the future income of every European writer, musician, illustrator,
filmmaker, journalist and game designer whose work is being ingested
into AI training systems. The two negotiations are running in
parallel, and they will define the rules under which creators
participate in — or are displaced from — the AI economy. Decisions
taken in the next few months will hold for the next decade.
What CCIs stand to lose.
Without strategic-sector designation in the ECF, Cultural and
Creative Industries are pushed into a small cultural silo —
principally the Creative Europe programme (~€2.4 billion
over seven years) and the AgoraEU democracy programme — while
telecommunications, pharma, defence, space, clean tech and digital
move into a consolidated framework an order of magnitude larger.
Concretely:
- No strategic sector designation — so no dedicated calls in the ECF Policy Windows.
- No dedicated funding line — losing access to research, scale-up and infrastructure budgets that other strategic sectors receive.
- No copyright or creator-remuneration framework — leaving European creators unprotected as their work feeds AI training.
- No Article 30 Skills Guarantee — denying CCIs the AI-literacy and re-skilling support given to clean transition, defence, space and digital workers.
- No seat in ECF governance — no voice in the Strategic Stakeholders Board, the InvestEU Advisory Board, or the Investment Committee.
- No "Make European" content procurement track — so European public service media, audiovisual production and creative innovation lose the procurement preference others enjoy.
The risk is not abstract. The Cultural and Creative
Industries are larger than telecommunications or
the automotive industry — and the framework that will fund European
competitiveness for the next decade currently treats them as a
footnote. If this brief is not heard, 7.9 million workers
and 2.1 million enterprises will spend the 2028–2034 cycle locked
out of the room where the strategic decisions about Europe's
industrial and digital future are made. There is no second draft.